data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3073f/3073f999b2e617ab1ca8d96d846fbcf7bb72c5d2" alt=""
Here's one with the famous car in outline.
...don't mind me, I'm just thinking out loud...
Daily Breeze - Associated Press: "Well south of the tundra, Schwarzenegger's enthusiastic backing of Proposition 71 helped land sunny California on the cutting edge of a technology questioned by the Bush administration and others. Polls indicated Schwarzenegger's endorsement, coupled with commercials featuring the late 'Superman' star Christopher Reeve, put the proposal over the top."
And ethics expert Dr. Scott Rae of Talbot Theological Seminary said, "There's no reason why we can't and shouldn't be using adult stem cells. And so far most of the most promising research that's actually producing results is coming from stem cells derived from bone marrow, cord blood and from, of all things, fat cells. I never thought liposuction would have redeeming value."
Rae says, by contrast, we must consider an embryo as a person with dignity. "We have a problem with harvesting stem cells from human embryos because that's the moral equivalent of killing a person in order to benefit another."
Rae compares that to the behavior of Nazi medical doctors who experimented on Jews without their consent, for the sake of society. Of course, it is impossible to get the required consent from an embryonic cloned person.
Rae said, "That's been a fairly standard part of medical ethics - we don't require, we would never ask nor would we obligate someone to sacrifice their existence in order to benefit someone else."
Even though there is much to report on the progress of adult stem cell research, very little actually is being highlighted by the media.
Also, from what is reported, there is a real question of whether the public is getting the full story on embryonic vs. adult stem cells. For example, most people have never heard from the mainstream media that implanted embryonic cells can produce malignant tumors.